Zero-Trust enforcement for enterprise AI.
DeepInspect authorizes, redacts, or blocks every AI request inline, then writes a cryptographically signed forensic record for regulatory defense.
Four surfaces of the AI governance problem, one control plane.
The gateway sits in the request path with sub-50ms overhead, evaluates policy, and writes an evidence-grade record before the response is released.
Intelligent Security
Identity- and data-aware enforcement. Inline. Fail-closed.
Verifiable Governance
HMAC-signed forensic record for every decision.
Cost & Routing
Tier-based model routing, failover, per-token attribution.
Agent & MCP Governance
Per-tool policy and signed agent traces across every hop.
Who Owns AI Governance Liability in an Enterprise?
AI governance is a responsibility boundary. Regulators and boards want enforcement records, not dashboards.
The boundary falls on the enterprise rather than the model provider. Provider terms of service place contractual responsibility for how a model is used inside a customer environment on the customer. A regulatory inquiry about a specific AI decision reaches the CISO and the compliance officer, and the durable answer is a runtime record of how each AI request was handled together with the policy version in effect at the time.
Enterprises own:
Each obligation maps to an operational record only the enterprise can produce. Regulatory exposure resolves when the enterprise shows the specific decisions the system made and the policy versions in effect. Audit outcomes improve when the auditor reads records that each carry a per-record cryptographic signature verifiable on its own. Breach narratives hold together when every AI interaction in the sequence carries its own integrity proof. Board accountability follows the pattern of financial controls, signed attestations rather than best-effort summaries.
Governance requires reconstruction of who accessed what data and why a decision was allowed.
The risk lives in ungoverned AI usage inside your enterprise.
Point your AI client at the gateway. Nothing else changes.
Enforcement activates gradually from observe mode to enforce mode, per application and per data class. Application code stays intact.
Product
Inline enforcement between callers and models.
Identity-aware policy, deterministic evaluation, fail-closed by default. Sub-50ms overhead in the request path.
Forensics
Signed record for every AI decision.
Reconstruct any interaction. Verify integrity per record.
Architecture
Deterministic policy engine, default-deny posture.
Deploys inline. Payload-agnostic. Provider-neutral.
< 50ms
Gateway overhead
100%
Decisions signed
6+
Providers supported
HMAC
Per-record integrity
Recent thinking.
All posts →October 21, 2026
Microsoft Purview vs Nightfall for AI Data Protection
Microsoft Purview and Nightfall both address sensitive-data exposure, but their strongest operating contexts differ. Purview ties data posture and DLP to Microsoft 365, Azure, Fabric, Edge, endpoints, and supported integrations, with audit and investigation. Nightfall emphasizes cloud DLP for SaaS and endpoints, including browsers and GenAI use. This guide compares prerequisites and sensors, policy paths and evidence, migration tests, and the separate role of identity-aware HTTP enforcement.
October 21, 2026
PromptArmor Alternatives for Third-Party AI Risk
PromptArmor now centers continuous risk intelligence for third-party AI vendors, assets, connectors, and MCP tools. That makes its replacement decision different from a prompt-filter comparison. This guide compares Credo AI, Microsoft Purview DSPM, a TPRM workflow with direct vendor evidence, and DeepInspect by inventory source, risk object, monitoring signal, approval artifact, and runtime enforcement boundary.
October 21, 2026
Pillar Security Alternatives by Control Surface
Pillar Security spans AI asset discovery, posture analysis, agentic red teaming, runtime guardrails, endpoint governance, and compliance evidence. Replacing it requires a module-exit plan rather than a generic AI security shortlist. This guide compares Mindgard, Cisco AI Defense, Microsoft Defender for Cloud AI, and DeepInspect by control surface, integration dependency, evidence output, and production acceptance test.